CG 07 Punitive Discipline (Policy.Corrections.CG 07 Punitive Discipline.WebHome)

11. Inmate rules and regulations shall be enforced using a disciplinary system. Disciplinary actions are punitive in nature, in contrast to classification decisions which are non-punitive. The disciplinary system shall be fair, consistent, impartial, and objective. The primary objectives of the disciplinary system include:

137

111. Reduce the temptation of inmates to test the system;

138

111. Strengthen the resolve of staff to enforce inmate rules and regulations;

139

111. Avoid informal development of levels of misconduct which may:

140

1111. Result in a perception that misconduct is acceptable;

141

1111. Breed contempt for regulations and undermine discipline and order;

142

1111. Cause inmates to doubt the resolve of staff members to enforce rules and regulations; or

143

1111. Result in inconsistent enforcement among shifts.

144

11. Disciplinary actions shall be defined as one of two categories :

145

111. Minor:

146

1111. The elements of the violation are not significant enough to require a review hearing or due process. Minor sanctions generally apply to misconduct consisting of a violation of a rule not required to be processed as a “Major” disciplinary violation, as set forth in the Inmate Orientation Packet referenced in policy: CG 04 Orientation and Rules. Minor sanctions include:

147

11111. Verbal warning or reprimand;

148

11111. Written warning or reprimand; and

149

11111. Restriction of privileges (excluding mail and religious services) for up to seven days..

150

111. Major:

151

1111. The elements of the violation require a disciplinary hearing and due process. Major sanctions apply to misconduct consisting of a violation of a rule required or permitted to be processed as a “Major” disciplinary violation, as set forth in the Inmate Orientation Packet referenced in policy: [[CG 04 Orientation and Rules>>doc:Policy.Corrections.CG 04 Orientation and Rules.WebHome]]. Major sanctions include:

152

11111. Any sanction exceeding the limitations of a temporary sanction as defined in this policy (section: PUNITIVE TEMPORARY RESTRICTIONS);

153

11111. Loss of accrued good-time;

154

11. Disciplinary requirements should balance the legitimate needs of the facility for security, safety, order, behavior modification, and inmate management with the interests of inmates to have a fair and equitable opportunity to be heard and refute allegations of major misconduct.

155

1. Rationale:

156

11. Discipline and compliance should be enforced to ensure reasonable safety of inmates, staff, visitors, and the community. Punitive sanctions to encourage compliance with rules, regulations, orders, and other directions are required when dealing with a population incarcerated due to an inability or unwillingness to comply with law and respect the rights of others.

157

11. Categorizing disciplinary actions permits minor disciplinary actions to be resolved without formal hearings, which are not required for minor sanctions and are more demanding on staff time and resources.

158

159

160

**CG 07_104 __CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS__**

161

162

1. Policy:

163

11. When an inmate violates an administrative rule which is also a violation of federal, state, or local law, the case should be:

164

111. Prosecuted administratively as a Major violation; and

165

111. Screened with the County Attorney for criminal charges.

166

11. The WCSO has been assigned jurisdiction to handle or take the lead in investigating, prosecuting, crime scene protection, and evidence handling of inmate criminal violations conducted within PCF. The Hurricane Police Department, or other outside agency, may be called upon to assist, with the approval of the Sheriff or the Sheriff's designee.

167

11. The Hurricane Police Department, or other outside agency, may be assigned jurisdiction or take the lead in investigating, prosecuting, crime scene protection, and evidence handling of inmate criminal violations conducted within PCF, with approval of the Sheriff or the Sheriff's designee.

168

11. WCSO staff should receive, at a minimum, annual training regarding crime scene protection and the preservation of evidence.

169

1. Rationale:

170

11. Criminal acts committed by inmates in a jail should be prosecuted, whenever feasible, because:

171

111. Criminal acts threaten the safety of staff, other inmates, and/or the public;

172

111. Criminal acts may diminish jail security, order, and discipline; and

173

111. Aggressive prosecution of crimes committed by incarcerated persons sends a message to inmates that such conduct will not be tolerated and that there are serious consequences for such violations.

174

11. Other agencies should be utilized to lead or assist with inmate criminal violations:

175

111. To avoid bias when there is suspected WCSO staff involvement in the violations;

176

111. To utilize the resources of other agencies; or

177

111. When the criminal acts appear to:

178

1111. Involve persons incarcerated in other jails or prisons; or

179

1111. Be tied to other ongoing investigations by other agencies.

180

11. Failure to properly protect the crime scene or preserve evidence relating to a criminal act in the jail may result in the case being compromised to the point that the case cannot be prosecuted or, if prosecuted, a conviction is less likely.

181

182

183

**CG 07_15 __PUNITIVE TEMPORARY RESTRICTIONS__**

184

185

1. Policy:

186

11. The following punitive temporary restrictions are minor sanctions and do not rise to the level of serious punishment and therefore do not require a disciplinary hearing:

187

111. Verbal warning or reprimand;

188

111. Written warning or reprimand;

189

111. Restriction of privileges (excluding mail and religious services) for up to seven days.

190

111. Other sanctions which do not rise to the level of Major status. While punishments other than those listed above may be imposed for minor violations without due process, punishments without due process should not result in atypical or substantial sanctions.

191

11. Inmates shall be notified of any temporary restrictions placed upon them. Notification may be made verbally; however, documentation of the notice shall also be made in the jail computer system.

192

11. If the circumstances of a disciplinary action do not justify a fact-finding hearing and formal action, the matter may be handled informally. However, even informal actions shall be documented in the jail computer system to ensure consistent reporting and handling of inmate discipline.

193

194

195

**CG 07_16 __NOTICE__**

196

197

1. Policy:

198

11. Inmates shall receive notice of PCF rules and regulations via the Inmate Orientation Packet (reference policy: [[CG 04 Orientation and Rules>>doc:Policy.Corrections.CG 04 Orientation and Rules.WebHome]]).

199

11. Inmates accused of major disciplinary violations shall be given written notice of their alleged misconduct at least 24 hours prior to their disciplinary hearing. Care should be exercised to ensure that the written notice clearly and accurately states the circumstances alleged. Notification shall include:

200

111. The date, time, and location of the alleged misconduct;

201

111. The rule code and title violated;

202

111. A brief description of the alleged misconduct; and

203

111. Date and time of the scheduled disciplinary hearing.

204

11. The notice to the inmate should not include information of a confidential nature which would expose:

205

111. The names of confidential informants or inmate witnesses who might be put at risk;

206

111. Details of an investigation; or

207

111. Other information which would place at risk PCF's legitimate interests (e.g., safety, security, order).

208

11. For State contract inmates, a copy of the disciplinary notice should be forwarded to the State caseworker as soon as possible.

209

1. Rationale:

210

11. Inmates should not be expected to comply with rules or regulations that they have not been informed of.

211

11. Inmates are constitutionally entitled to written notice prior to hearings for alleged major misconduct to ensure that they understand the circumstances.

212

11. Only that information which is necessary to ensure that the inmate can prepare his/her case is required in the notice.

213

214

215

**CG 07_107 __FILING CHARGES__**

216

217

1. Policy:

218

11. Certified staff who observe or otherwise become aware of inmate misconduct should initiate the discipline process. Non-certified staff should notify a certified staff member and the certified staff member should initiate the process.

219

11. Staff should draft and forward the incident report to the shift supervisor for review.

220

11. Disciplinary actions should be initiated without unreasonable delay. However, inmates are not entitled to a maximum time limit on the filing of disciplinary charges or setting of a hearing.

221

11. The delay in initiating disciplinary charges should not prejudice inmates in their ability to refute allegations.

222

11. The misconduct of inmates should be documented in the jail computer system.

223

1. Rationale:

224

11. Certified staff have more training relative to managing inmates. Thus, non-certified staff should allow certified staff to handle inmate discipline issues.

225

226

227

**CG 07_108 __DUE PROCESS & DISCIPLINARY HEARING__**

228

229

1. Policy:

230

11. A hearing shall be required for all major disciplinary actions.

231

11. Hearings should be provided in a timely manner.

232

11. Hearings shall be conducted by an impartial hearing officer. A hearing officer shall not have participated in the case in an investigative function, a review function, as a witness, or have personal knowledge of material facts. Additionally, the hearing officer should not be involved in escorting or handcuffing the inmate to be heard.

233

11. Before conducting a hearing, the IDHO should review the initiating report and any other associated information or materials.

234

11. Disciplinary hearings shall not be held less than 24 hours following notice to the inmate, unless the inmate waives the 24-hour requirement.

235

11. As a general guideline, disciplinary hearings should be held as soon as possible (after the 24-hour notice period). If a hearing cannot be scheduled within seven days, a log entry should be made in the jail computer system indicating the reason(s) for the delay. Delays in hearing disciplinary cases should not be permitted to prejudice the inmate's ability to defend the allegations of misconduct.

236

11. Any temporary restrictions imposed on inmates awaiting hearing should be considered by the IDHO in scheduling disciplinary hearings.

237

11. The IDHO has the discretion and authority to grant or deny continuances requested by staff or inmates. Inmates are not entitled to a continuance of the proceeding unless denying the continuance would:

238

111. Amount to a refusal to allow the inmate to present evidence or call an otherwise acceptable witness important to defending against the allegations; or

239

111. Otherwise materially prejudice the inmate's ability to defend against the allegations.

240

11. The rules of evidence do not apply in the hearing. All relevant evidence is admissible. The IDHO has the discretion to determine what evidence is relevant.

241

1. Rationale:

242

11. Inmate discipline due process is required to:

243

111. Ensure compliance with the requirements of law; and

244

111. Provide fundamental fairness to inmates.

245

11. Timely hearings serve PCF's interests by providing swift and sure responses to inmate misconduct.

246

11. Hearings provide an opportunity for accused inmates to refute alleged misconduct.

247

11. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an impartial hearing is constitutionally required.

248

11. Because the intent of the imposition of punitive restrictions is to punish, a fact-finding hearing should be provided to determine a verdict relative to the alleged misconduct if there is a potential that serious punishment may result.

249

250

251

**CG 07_109 __DOCUMENTATION OF HEARINGS__**

252

253

1. Policy:

254

11. The IDHO shall document each disciplinary hearing in the jail computer system (additional audio recording may be made). In listing the evidence relied upon, the IDHO shall be specific as to which testimony, physical evidence, documentary evidence, or other evidence or information was relied upon in determining the verdict.

255

11. Protected information (e.g., informant names) shall not be included in the computer entry. Protected information shall be documented and archived in a separate location with limited access. When confidential information is admitted into consideration for a hearing, the IDHO:

256

111. Should evaluate the reliability of the information and/or information source;

257

111. Should document the perceived reliability; and

258

111. If it would not present a hazard to PCF interests, provide the inmate with a synopsis of the information received so he/she can try to refute the information.

259

11. At a minimum, the IDHO should document and record:

260

111. Rulings on:

261

1111. Admissibility of evidence;

262

1111. Requests to call witnesses;

263

1111. Requests to cross examine adverse witnesses;

264

1111. Requests for legal assistance; and

265

1111. Other requests/motions;

266

111. Testimony or other information received from confidential sources;

267

111. Information relative to the reliability of confidential information sources;

268

111. The evidence relied upon in developing findings of fact;

269

111. The reasons for the disciplinary action taken;

270

111. Instructions to the inmate to compel testimony and warnings concerning adverse inferences; and

271

111. Other information necessary to substantiate that:

272

1111. Adequate due process was provided;

273

1111. Verdicts were based on sufficient evidence; and

274

1111. Sanctions were not unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious.

275

11. If made, audio recordings shall be retained in an electronic archive for a minimum of five years from the date of the hearing. After five years, audio recordings may be deleted from the archive. If a disciplinary case is the subject of litigation, or is otherwise being contested by the inmate, the audio recording should be retained until the matter has proceeded to final disposition. Final disposition will be realized after a court has ruled and the opportunity for further appeal has expired.

276

11. A copy of the hearing disposition shall be:

277

111. Provided in the inmate's disciplinary file;

278

111. Provided to the inmate; and

279

111. Provided to the State caseworker (for State inmates).

280

1. Rationale:

281

11. Proper documentation memorializes events and may aid PCF in answering litigation.

282

11. The reasons for determining whether there was sufficient evidence to support the allegations of misconduct must be documented:

283

111. To provide the accused inmate the reasons for the decision;

284

111. To provide facility staff the reasons for the decision; and

285

111. To memorialize the evidence relied upon by the IDHO for the determination.

286

287

288

**CG 07_110 __PRESENTING EVIDENCE__**

289

290

1. Policy:

291

11. Subject to restrictions as determined by the IDHO, accused inmates should be permitted to present evidence to defend against alleged misconduct.

292

11. Evidence at hearings may include:

293

111. Testimony;

294

111. Writings/documents;

295

111. Material objects; or

296

111. Other information offered to prove the existence or nonexistence of a fact.

297

11. The rules by which evidence must be received and admitted in a criminal or civil court shall not govern administrative discipline hearings.

298

11. Rules of evidence shall be flexible and are intended to ascertain the truth of the matter under consideration with a minimum of procedural impediments.

299

11. Testimony does not have to be received in person. It may be received by telephone, video, or in writing; including, but not limited to: drug test reports, signed statements, incident reports, and affidavits.

300

11. Hearsay is admissible, but should be relevant. The IDHO has the discretion and responsibility to consider the reliability of the source and information.

301

11. Formally admitting into evidence the actual physical evidence (e.g., damaged equipment, torn clothing, drugs seized) is not necessary. Evidence can be offered by photocopy, photograph, or testimony.

302

11. It is not required that the accused inmate be physically present for all phases of the hearing.

303

1. Rationale:

304

11. Procedural differences for administrative disciplinary actions are permitted by law.

305

11. Flexible evidence procedures minimize procedural impediments.

306

307

308

**CG 07_111 __CALLING WITNESSES__**

309

310

1. Policy:

311

11. Inmates have a limited right to call witnesses in a disciplinary proceeding.

312

11. The IDHO may refuse an inmate's request to call a witness. The IDHO may refuse to call a witness if he/she determines the testimony:

313

111. Would not be relevant or material;

314

111. Would be redundant, cumulative, or unnecessary; or

315

111. Would be hazardous to the legitimate interests of the PCF.

316

11. If a request to call a witness is denied, the IDHO should document the reasons.

317

1. Rationale:

318

11. Limits in regard to an inmate calling witnesses are permitted by law.

319

320

321

**CG 07_112 __CONFRONTING ACCUSER/CROSS-EXAMINATION__**

322

323

1. Policy:

324

11. An IDHO should deny cross-examination by an inmate.

325

11. An IDHO may permit cross-examination and confrontation if:

326

111. The confrontation or cross-examination is essential to the fact-finding effort; and

327

111. It can be done without a significant risk:

328

1111. Of retaliation against the witness or others;

329

1111. To safety or security;

330

1111. Of personal antagonism between the inmate and the witness; and

331

1111. It would not result in unnecessary delays or otherwise reduce the manageability of the hearings.

332

1. Rationale:

333

11. Inmates do not have a right to confront accusers or to cross-examine adverse witnesses in administrative disciplinary hearings, and allowing such may risk the safety and security of inmates and PCF.

334

335

336

**CG 07_112 __ASSISTANCE TO INMATES__**

337

338

1. Policy:

339

11. Legal counsel shall not be permitted to represent inmates at disciplinary hearings. However, a staff member may assist the inmate if the IDHO determines the accused inmate is not competent to represent himself or the issues are too complex for the inmate to prepare a defense without assistance.

340

11. In determining the need for assistance the IDHO should determine whether the accused inmate is:

341

111. Illiterate;

342

111. Unable to communicate in English;

343

111. Not mentally competent; or

344

111. Sight, hearing, or otherwise physically impaired.

345

1. Rationale:

346

11. Some inmates may require assistance to prepare a defense.

347

348

349

**CG 07_113 __SELF-INCRIMINATION__**

350

351

1. Policy:

352

11. If an inmate refuses to answer questions at a disciplinary hearing, the inmate shall be warned that:

353

111. He/she is not constitutionally entitled to remain silent in a disciplinary hearing; and

354

111. His/her silence may result in an adverse inference.

355

11. If an inmate refuses to answer questions relevant to the issues of the disciplinary proceeding after receiving the above warnings, adverse inferences may be drawn.

356

11. If adverse inferences are considered by the IDHO in establishing the required level of proof, the inferences shall be listed in the written findings among the other factors relied upon by the IDHO to determine that the alleged misconduct occurred.

357

11. If the disciplinary misconduct alleged has resulted in, or is likely to result in, criminal charges in addition to the administrative disciplinary proceeding, an independent investigation of the matter will take place without any involvement from the IDHO. The IDHO may not share any information from the disciplinary hearing with the criminal investigator. However, the IDHO may, at the option of the IDHO, allow the inmate not to testify in the disciplinary hearing without drawing a negative inference.

358

1. Rationale:

359

11. Inmates defending against disciplinary actions are not constitutionally protected from self-incrimination when asked questions during administrative proceedings.

360

361

362

**CG 07_114 __DOUBLE JEOPARDY__**

363

364

1. Policy:

365

11. Criminal and administrative cases shall be handled separately by separate individuals.

366

11. Testimonies and other evidence from a disciplinary hearing shall not be shared with a criminal investigator.

367

11. Because guilty verdicts in criminal trials require a higher standard of proof than is required in administrative discipline proceeding, a not-guilty criminal verdict shall not prevent a finding of guilt in the discipline hearing.

368

1. Rationale:

369

11. It is not double jeopardy to charge an inmate with both criminal and administrative violations for the same event.

370

371

372

**CG 07_115 __STANDARD OF PROOF__**

373

374

1. Policy:

375

11. The IDHO may find the accused inmate guilty of the alleged misconduct if there is some evidence to support the charges.

376

11. Absent some evidence to support the allegations, the IDHO shall find the accused inmate not guilty of the alleged misconduct.

377

11. As a matter of practice, the IDHO should include in the written findings evidence sufficient to meet the "some evidence" standard whenever possible.

378

1. Rationale:

379

11. Requiring that there be some identifiable evidence upon which the IDHO is to base the determination will ensure a greater margin against error in the event that a guilty finding in a disciplinary action is appealed or challenged in a civil action.

380

381

382

**CG 07_116 __APPROVED SANCTIONS__**

383

384

1. Policy:

385

11. Punishments shall be consistent with the offense. In general, and when appropriate, progressive discipline should be used. For minor offenses, the following guidelines should be used, when appropriate:

386

111. First offense: verbal warning;

387

111. Second offense: one-day restriction;

388

111. Third offense: three-day restriction;

389

111. Fourth offense: seven-day restriction;

390

111. Fifth offense: isolation (lockdown) pending formal disciplinary hearing.

391

11. When coercive measures are required to enforce proper conduct and compliance with regulations, those measures should be taken in a decisive manner.

392

11. Disciplinary punishments for serious or repeated minor misconduct must be strong enough to impress upon the inmate the intent of PCF officials to demand and enforce compliance.

393

11. Approved sanctions include, but are not limited to:

394

111. Loss of personal mail privileges for up to seven days, or fourteen days with approval of the Corrections Chief Deputy, for violations of mail regulations;

395

111. Denial of, or removal from, education programs, treatment programs, and/or congregate religious services;

396

111. Restriction of other privileges and/or amenities ordinarily available;

397

111. Loss of accrued good-time (County inmates only);

398

111. Requests to Board of Pardons and Parole to rescind an inmate's release date;

399

111. Punitive isolation (lockdown);

400

111. Requiring the inmate to make restitution.

401

1. Rationale:

402

11. Verbal warnings may be given because discipline need not be entirely punitive. Efforts to instruct, counsel, and encourage compliance with rules and regulations should supplement the discipline process.

403

11. Progressive discipline should be used where appropriate and possible because punishments which are unnecessarily harsh for less serious offenses may result in antagonism, without the intended benefit of good discipline, and may exceed constitutional limits in some cases.

404

11. Likewise, less severe punishments where stronger punishments are appropriate may have the unintended effect of encouraging future misconduct.

405

11. Informal actions such as reprimands and counseling may be more appropriate for minor offenses than formal actions, especially if the violation is a first offense.

406

407

408

**CG 07_118 __SANCTION GUIDELINES__**

409

410

1. Policy:

411

11. The sanction guidelines for IDHOs, per single guilty violation, after due process (excluding other elements), are:

412

111. If guilty of any VC-4:

413

1111. Seven to twenty-one days restriction; and/or

414

1111. One to ten days lockdown; and/or

415

1111. Restitution.

416

111. If guilty of any VC-3:

417

1111. Twenty-one to thirty-five days restriction; and/or

418

1111. Ten to twenty days lockdown; and/or

419

1111. Restitution.

420

111. If guilty of any VC-2:

421

1111. Thirty-five to forty-nine days restriction; and/or

422

1111. Twenty to thirty days lockdown; and/or

423

1111. Restitution.

424

111. If guilty of any VC-1:

425

1111. Restitution; and/or

426

1111. Fifty days restriction; and/or

427

1111. Thirty to forty-five days lockdown; or

428

1111. Up to sixty days lockdown for aggravated offenses and/or circumstances; or

429

1111. Over sixty days lockdown with approval from the Corrections Chief Deputy.

430

1. Rationale:

431

11. Although general guidelines won't necessarily be able to address every situation, established guidelines can help maintain consistency and fairness.

432

433

434

**CG 07_119 __SANCTION RESTRICTIONS__**

435

436

1. Policy:

437

11. Inmates shall not be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment.

438

11. Inmates shall not be placed in restraints as a means of punishment (reference policy CG 06 Non-Punitive Restriction).

439

11. Inmates should not be sentenced to punitive isolation (lockdown) for longer than sixty days on any one disciplinary violation without approval from the Corrections Chief Deputy (this prohibition does not limit the length of non-punitive isolation resulting from a classification decision).

440

11. Inmates shall not be deprived of water:

441

111. Water may be shut off in a cell for security or operational necessity in order to prevent flooding or other misuse of water or plumbing.

442

111. If it is necessary to shut off water in a cell, the shift supervisor shall ensure that there is adequate water provided on an as-needed basis for drinking, hygiene, and toilets. Toilets shall be turned on to permit flushing after inmate use.

443

11. Inmates shall not be denied food or be given a modified diet for disciplinary reasons (refer to policy: CG 06 Non-Punitive Restriction).

444

11. The IDHO shall not deny inmates basic necessities such as toilet facilities, clothing, or bedding. However, if an inmate destroys bedding or clothing, the standard clothing or bedding issue may be modified to protect against the destruction of jail property or for the safety and security of the facility. The decision to remove bedding or clothing may be made by the shift supervisor (or higher-ranking official) and may last only until the exigency requiring the deprivation has been resolved.

445

11. Inmates may not be prevented from maintaining personal hygiene as a disciplinary action. Inmates shall not be deprived of soap, toothbrush, comb, shaving implements, nor showers as a disciplinary action.

446

11. Corporal punishment shall not be used.

447

11. Disciplinary sanctions shall not be capricious or retaliatory.

448

1. Rationale:

449

11. Inmates have legal rights to basic necessities such as water and food. Disciplinary decisions cannot legally revoke an inmate's basic legal rights. However, non-disciplinary management restrictions may be imposed to address specific issues (reference policy: CG 06 Non-Punitive Restriction).

450

451

452

**CG 07_120 __IMPOSING SANCTIONS__**

453

454

1. Policy:

455

11. After a finding of guilty, the IDHO shall determine what, if any, punishment or other actions are required.

456

11. The severity of punitive actions imposed by the IDHO should be consistent with the severity of the rule violation and the inmate's disciplinary history.

457

11. A disciplinary offense may be punished by a single sanction or by multiple penalties. In no case shall the IDHO order any sanction prohibited by this policy.

458

11. It shall be a breach of duty for any member of PCF staff to fail to fully implement any sanctions which fall within his/her area of responsibility.

459

11. Shift supervisors shall be responsible for ensuring that staff members execute those sanctions scheduled for implementation during their respective shifts.

460

1. Rationale:

461

11. Disciplinary sanctions are counter-productive if not carried out.

462

463

464

**CG 07_121 __TERMINATION OF SANCTIONS__**

465

466

1. Policy:

467

11. Disciplinary sanctions shall be promptly terminated when the required punishments have been fulfilled.

468

11. Each certified staff member is responsible for calendaring the termination date for any punishments for which that certified staff member is responsible.

469

11. It is a breach of duty for any certified staff member to fail to promptly terminate completed punishments which fall within his/her area of responsibility.

470

11. Shift supervisors are responsible for ensuring that staff members terminate sanctions in a timely manner.

471

1. Rationale:

472

11. The extension of disciplinary sanctions could trigger potential due process violations.

473

474

475

**CG 07_122 __DISCIPLINARY APPEAL__**

476

477

1. Policy:

478

11. Inmates shall not be permitted to file a grievance form regarding formal disciplinary action (inmates may file a disciplinary appeal).

479

11. Inmates should be permitted to appeal disciplinary findings and sanctions.

480

11. The appeal for disciplinary actions will go to the Sheriff, or Sheriff's designee.

481

1. Rationale:

482

11. Inmates are not constitutionally entitled to an appeal of the disciplinary findings or sanctions of the IDHO. Appeals are provided by the PCF:

483

111. To ensure that inmate discipline is handled in a fair and consistent manner; and

484

111. To provide the Sheriff the opportunity to discover any deficiencies in due process, documentation of findings, or severity of disciplinary punishments.

485

11. The Sheriff has the ultimate liability for the actions of the staff of PCF; thus, the Sheriff should be informed of possible misconduct or erroneous actions.

486

1. Procedure:

487

11. If an inmate found guilty of misconduct disagrees with the findings or sanctions in a disciplinary action, the inmate may appeal to the Sheriff. The appeal may be initiated by completing a disciplinary appeal form within five days of receiving the disciplinary disposition and forwarding it through facility mail to the Sheriff.

488

11. The inmate may appeal the disciplinary findings or sanctions by articulating a claim that:

489

111. The due process provided was inadequate;

490

111. There was insufficient evidence to support the allegations; and/or

491

111. The sanctions are unconstitutionally harsh compared to the misconduct for which he/she was found guilty.

492

11. In making the appeal, the inmate shall be required to fully state the reason(s) for each claim on the appeal document.

493

11. The inmate will not appear personally before the Sheriff to state his/her appeal.

494

11. If the Sheriff determines additional evidence or testimony should be received, he may remand the case back to the IDHO for further proceedings, stating the reasons for the remand. The subsequent IDHO's ruling in the case following remand is also subject to appeal.

495

11. Upon making a final determination on the appeal, the Sheriff shall enter his decision in writing.

496

11. The Sheriff (or designee) shall be the only appellate level for the PCF disciplinary process.

497

11. Inmates shall not be subject to retaliation for appeal of disciplinary findings.

498

11. Written appeal decisions shall be distributed to:

499

111. The IDHO supervisor;

500

111. The inmate;

501

111. The inmate's disciplinary file.

Wiki source code of CG 07 Punitive Discipline