CG 05 Inmate Classification (Policy.Corrections.CG 05 Inmate Classification.WebHome)

1. Step-Down: A type of Administrative Segregation. A temporary down-grade of an inmate's classification level, in conjunction with close administrative review.

78

79

80

**CG 05_102 __REFERENCES__**

81

82

1. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Standards:

83

11. 5.

84

1. Utah Sheriffs' Association Jail Standards:

85

11. D02.01.01: Written Classification Policies and Procedures Required

86

11. D02.02.01: Designated Classification Officer

87

11. D02.02.02: Classification Training

88

11. D02.03.01: Classification Function

89

11. D02.03.02: Classification is Non-Punitive

90

11. D02.03.03: Scope of Classification Plan

91

11. D02.03.05: Classification Reassessment

92

11. D02.03.06: Prisoner Requests for Reconsideration of Classification

93

11. D02.04.01: General Classification Criteria Requirements

94

11. D02.04.02: Classification Criteria: Race

95

11. D02.04.03: Classification Criteria: Gender

96

11. D02.04.04: Classification Criteria: Violent Prisoners

97

11. D02.04.05: Classification Criteria: Communicable Disease

98

11. D02.05.01: Documenting Classification

99

11. D02.05.02: Classification of Records

100

11. K01.01.01: Written Prisoner Surveillance Policies and Procedures Required

101

11. K01.01.02: Content

102

11. K01.02.02: Operational Requirements

103

11. K02.01.02: Content

104

105

106

**CG 05_103 __GENERAL__**

107

108

1. Policy:

109

11. PCF shall maintain written policy and procedures which provide the requirements for and elements of an inmate classification plan to:

110

111. Be used in determining housing assignments, access to programs and activities, and general management of inmates; and

111

111. Provide for the separation of inmates by sex and by such other factors as may reasonably provide for the safety and well-being of inmates and the community.

112

11. The classification plan shall take into consideration the design of the jail and shall identify the classification levels which can be housed in various cells and cell blocks. Classification procedures should be developed to offset the facility's design disadvantages or flaws.

113

11. At a minimum, the classification system shall provide a means of:

114

111. Evaluating inmates':

115

1111. Propensity for violence;

116

1111. Vulnerability to violence;

117

1111. Escape risk;

118

1111. Propensity for being disruptive or a management problem;

119

1111. Need for specific programs and services;

120

1111. Possible gang affiliation;

121

1111. Potential for infecting other inmates with a communicable disease; and

122

1111. Other needs to be segregated from others;

123

111. Determining:

124

1111. Appropriate levels of custody and housing assignments; and

125

1111. Eligibility for programs and services.

126

11. Components which shall be included in the classification plan include:

127

111. Pre-classification;

128

111. Classification;

129

111. Re-assessment (a.k.a., Classification Review);

130

111. Security threat groups;

131

111. Other inmates requiring special management;

132

111. Non-punitive isolation; and

133

111. Transfers of Utah State prisoners.

134

11. Applicable content and procedures regarding classification shall be communicated to inmates in a language or manner which the inmates can understand. Classification shall utilize translation services when necessary. The Inmate Orientation Packet shall include an explanation of the classification levels, with the conditions and restrictions applicable to each and the procedures by which a detainee may appeal his/her classification.

135

1. Rationale:

136

11. Written policies and procedures are necessary to ensure that staff members understand the purpose, function, and elements of the inmate classification system.

137

11. Adoption and implementation of written policy for the classification of persons incarcerated in jail is also required by statute.

138

11. Classification is an important tool in managing inmates, providing a safe facility, and preventing inmates from escaping. Without some form of classification process, jail administrators face a very difficult challenge in meeting these important functions.

139

140

141

**CG 05_104 __SUPERVISION & TRAINING__**

142

143

1. Policy:

144

11. PCF shall designate an officer to supervise the classification system.

145

11. The classification supervisor should:

146

111. Be responsible for reviewing classification, re-classification, and special housing assignments;

147

111. Have the authority to overrule classification actions; and

148

111. Handle inmate classification challenges and grievances.

149

11. The classification supervisor may utilize the assistance of other staff members, as approved by the Corrections Chief Deputy.

150

11. The classification supervisor may have other duties and responsibilities.

151

11. Classification training should be provided for those officers who are involved in the classification process. Advanced classification training should be provided to the classification supervisor.

152

11. All classification officers shall be certified Corrections Officers.

153

11. All classification officers shall receive annual training and shall receive specific instruction on the PCF classification system.

154

1. Rationale:

155

11. Designating an officer to administer the classification system is necessary to ensure that the classification process operates in a consistent and uniform manner and makes it more difficult for inmates to manipulate the system.

156

11. Classification is the backbone of inmate management and a necessary component in maintaining safety and security in the facility. To understand the function and important elements of the classification system, training is needed concerning procedural requirements. The responsibility of supervising the classification process requires more advanced training including procedural, legal, documentation, and operational topics.

157

158

159

**CG 05_106 __NON-PUNITIVE__**

160

161

1. Policy:

162

11. The inmate classification system shall be operated as a non-punitive management system, separate and distinct from inmate discipline. However, disciplinary violations may be included among the criteria used in classifying and reclassifying inmates.

163

1. Rationale:

164

11. If the classification process is operated as a non-punitive system, separate and distinct from the punitive inmate discipline system, classification decisions do not trigger due process requirements for inmates.

165

166

167

**CG 05_107 __PRE-CLASSIFICATION__**

168

169

1. Policy:

170

11. Pre-classification procedures shall be managed according to policy: [[CF 02 Admission and Booking>>doc:Policy.Corrections.CF 02 Admission Booking and Bail.WebHome]].

171

172

173

**CG 05_108 __CLASSIFICATION__**

174

175

1. Policy:

176

11. Unclassified inmates should be classified expeditiously upon admission (within seven days) and prior to general housing (i.e., housed in an intake cell or block).

177

11. Any inmate who cannot be classified because of missing information at the time of processing (e.g., the results of a criminal record check) may be kept separated from the general population. Once the needed information is obtained, classification shall be expedited.

178

11. PCF shall adopt specific criteria to be used in classifying inmates. That criteria should include, but not be limited to:

111. Gender;

111. Age;

111. Offense;

111. Criminal history;

183

111. Time to release;

184

111. Observed, seriously irregular behavior; and

185

111. If known or obvious to jail officials:

186

1111. Communicable disease;

187

1111. Seriously mentally or emotionally disordered;

188

1111. Escape history;

189

1111. Violence history;

190

1111. Drug abuse history;

191

1111. Association with security threat group;

192

1111. Disciplinary history; and

193

1111. Disruptive behavior history.

194

11. Race shall not be used as a criteria to segregate inmates.

195

11. Inmates shall be segregated by gender. Male and female inmates shall be housed in a manner which:

196

111. Does not permit inmates to routinely view the living areas (cells and day rooms) of inmates of the opposite gender; and

197

111. Prevents routine verbal conversation between male and female inmates.

198

11. Inmates known by jail officials to be a serious risk to commit violent acts against others should be segregated, or other reasonable measures should be taken to mitigate the risk.

199

11. Inmates who present a serious risk of infecting other inmates with a communicable disease should be segregated, if deemed necessary by medical authority.

200

1. Rationale:

201

11. The classification factors listed above may, individually or in combination, have some value as predictors of an inmate's behavior while incarcerated.

202

11. Some factors have greater value than others.

203

11. Using race as a criteria to segregate inmates has been found to violate the United States Constitution. However, corrections officials do have the right, acting in good faith and in particularized circumstances, to take into account racial tensions in maintaining security, discipline, and good order.

204

11. Separation of male and female inmates is required by state law. It is not intended that male and female inmates shall be absolutely separated by sight and sound. Separation is required only to the extent necessary to protect inmates and to further the legitimate safety, security, order, and discipline interests of the jail.

205

11. Inmates are entitled to precautions which provide reasonable protection from other inmates who present a known, serious, and immediate risk to their lives or safety. Jail officials cannot absolutely guarantee the safety of jailed inmates, but must take reasonable steps to protect inmates' safety. Jail officials must not be deliberately indifferent to the safety of inmates.

206

11. Jail officials have a difficult and sometimes impossible task because they cannot act upon information which they do not have, nor can they assume that every inmate who has ever committed a violent act is a serious or immediate risk to others (the majority of inmates have some violence in their criminal history or other past).

207

11. Jails are closed environments where inmates and staff coexist in close proximity. Preventing the spread of communicable disease may require segregation of inmates when the type of disease is sufficiently serious and contagious.

208

209

210

**CG 05_109 __CLASSIFICATION CODE__**

211

212

1. Policy:

213

11. Inmates will be classified with a two-digit classification code (e.g., 3K). The first digit will be a number identifying the inmate's classification level. The second digit will be a letter identifying the inmate's threat status.

214

11. Classification levels include levels one through five, with one being the highest security risk.

215

1. Rationale:

216

11. A dual-coded system allows jail staff to address multiple issues with one classification code per inmate (e.g., housing assignments, programming privileges, permitted property, etc.).

217

218

219

**CG 05_110 __CLASSIFICATION REVIEW__**

220

221

1. Policy:

222

11. Classification reviews should be conducted, at a minimum, according to the following schedule:

223

111. Administrative Segregation (including Step-Down, security threat groups, non-punitive isolation, and other special management inmates): at least once per week;

224

111. Lock Down: at least once prior to being released from Lock Down status;

225

111. Level-1, and Level-2: at least once every 180 days;

226

111. Level-3 and higher: at least once every year.

227

11. Additional reviews may be conducted as needed.

228

1. Rationale:

229

11. Predicting inmate behavior is a difficult and imprecise science. Often, officers must base classification decisions on limited information. Regular classification reviews will help ensure accurate classification determinations.

230

11. In prisons, officials can take days or weeks to classify a prisoner, and have pre-sentence investigations and other information to rely on. The nature of inmate classification in jails requires decisions to be made swiftly, frequently with limited available information. Thus, while prisons can function comfortably with annual classification re-assessments, jails should review more frequently.

231

232

233

**CG 05_111 __HOUSING__**

234

235

1. Policy:

236

11. Level1 inmates may not be housed with any other level of inmate unless approved by the Special Housing Committee or the Chief Deputy.

237

11. Excluding Level1 inmates, inmates may be housed with inmates one level above or one level below their assigned level.

238

11. Inmates housed in a cell shall be allowed time out of their cell according to the current Time Out Of Cell schedule. Inmates housed in a cell shall be informed of their scheduled out of cell times. A log entry should be created in the jail computer system under the individual inmate's name to record each time out of cell event.

239

1. Rationale:

240

11. A classification system serves little purpose if it is not used as a housing tool in order to help protect inmates and provide order.

241

242

243

**CG 05_112 __CLASSIFICATION CHALLENGES__**

244

245

1. Policy:

246

11. Inmates may be allowed to request reconsideration of their classification assignment by submitting a Classification Challenge form.

247

11. Inmates may be permitted one classification challenge per classification determination.

248

11. A classification challenge will not guarantee a change in the classification assignment; however, it will guarantee that a classification review will be conducted.

249

1. Rationale:

250

11. Due process is not constitutionally mandated for classification or re-classification determinations, unless a right is created by state action. Utah statute does not create a liberty interest which would require due process or a right of appeal for inmates. However, providing an opportunity for inmates to request reconsideration of their classification can be of benefit to both the inmate and jail officials. Inmates benefit by receiving an opportunity to request a review of a classification determination. If there is a flaw in the classification, jail officials benefit because the flaw can be discovered and corrected before it creates problems for the jail.

251

252

253

**CG 05_113 __INMATE UNIFORMS__**

254

255

1. Policy:

256

11. Each inmate shall be issued color-coded uniforms according to their classification level or housing unit as follows:

257

111. “A” threat status: solid red;

258

111. Lockdown status: red stripes;

259

111. Level 1: red stripes;

260

111. Level 2: black stripes;

261

111. Level 3, Level 4, Level 5 (interior) and Level 5A (interior): blue stripes;

262

111. Level 5 (exterior) and Level 5A (exterior): green stripes;

263

111. Unclassified: orange stripes;

264

111. Interior worker (while at work): solid white;

265

111. Exterior worker (while at work): solid “lime” green.

266

1. Rationale:

267

11. Staff may easily identify an inmate's classification according to the inmate's current uniform. An inmate's classification informs staff of the potential threat level of the specific inmate. By assisting staff with the identification of potential threats, staff may be better prepared to manage the inmate or possible situations involving the inmate.

268

269

270

**CG 05_114 __UTAH STATE PRISONERS__**

271

272

1. Policy:

273

11. Unless a PCF administrative override is conducted, Utah State prisoners shall retain their classification level assigned from the prison.

274

11. PCF should only accept custody of Utah State prisoners who have been classified as a Level-3 or higher.

275

11. If a Utah State prisoner's classification falls below Level-3 while housed at PCF, the prisoner shall be promptly transferred from PCF.

276

1. Rationale:

277

11. Utah State prisoners who are classified below a Level-3 are deemed too dangerous or too high of a risk to be housed at PCF.

278

279

280

**CG 05_115 __DOCUMENTATION__**

281

282

1. Policy:

283

11. Classification determinations shall be documented in the jail computer system.

284

11. Classification files and/or forms used to reach a classification determination shall be retained and archived for a minimum of three years.

285

1. Rationale:

286

11. Proper documentation memorializes actions taken and decisions made.

287

11. Inmate classification actions and decisions should be documented to preserve a record:

288

111. As an aid to defending possible future litigation;

289

111. To provide information which jail officials can use in order to stay informed;

290

111. For use in future classification actions involving the inmate; and

291

111. To provide data which can be quantified for use by jail officials.

292

293

294

**CG 05_116 __CLASSIFICATION OF RECORDS__**

295

296

1. Policy:

297

11. Classification files shall be classified as "controlled" or "protected" under the Governmental Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA).

298

1. Rationale:

299

11. Failure to classify the files as "controlled" or "protected" as required by GRAMA may make them accessible to the press, general public, and inmates.

300

11. Files can ordinarily be classified as "controlled" because disclosure of information contained in the classification documents may be detrimental to the safety of the person who disclosed the information or other individuals.

301

11. Files can be classified as "protected" because disclosure of information contained in classification documents could reasonably be expected to:

302

111. Interfere with investigations undertaken for enforcement purposes;

303

111. Disclose the identify of a source who is confidential and could compromise the source;

304

111. Disclose investigative techniques, procedures, policies, or orders not generally known outside of government and disclosure would interfere with enforcement efforts;

305

111. Jeopardize the life or safety of an individual;

306

111. Jeopardize the security of government property, governmental programs, or governmental record-keeping systems from damage or use contrary to law or public policy; or

307

111. Jeopardize the security or safety of a correctional facility, or records relating to incarceration, treatment, probation, or parole; that would interfere with control and supervision of an offender's incarceration, treatment, probation, or parole.

Wiki source code of CG 05 Inmate Classification