Skip to Content

Wiki source code of AD 01 Prisoner Searches

Version 5.1 by Ryan Larkin on 2017/01/09 16:38
Hide last authors
Ryan Larkin 1.1 1 **Washington County Sheriff's Office**
2
3 **ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION**
4
5 Policy Manual
6
7
8 Volume: AD
9
10 Searches
11
12 Chapter: 01
13
14 Prisoner Searches
15
16
17 Replaces and/or Supersedes:
18
19 PD 01, CD 01
20
21 Published:
22
23 01/26/2011
24
25 Review Date:
26
27 01/26/2012
28
29
30 Sheriff Cory Pulsipher
31
32 Undersheriff Bart Bailey
33
34
35 **__TABLE OF CONTENTS__**
36
Ryan Larkin 5.1 37 AD 01_101 Definitions
Ryan Larkin 1.1 38
Ryan Larkin 5.1 39 AD 01_102 References
Ryan Larkin 1.1 40
Ryan Larkin 5.1 41 AD 01_103 General
Ryan Larkin 1.1 42
Ryan Larkin 5.1 43 AD 01_104 Frisk Search
Ryan Larkin 1.1 44
Ryan Larkin 5.1 45 AD 01_105 Rub Search
Ryan Larkin 1.1 46
Ryan Larkin 5.1 47 AD 01_106 Strip Search
Ryan Larkin 1.1 48
Ryan Larkin 5.1 49 AD 01_107 Visual Body Cavity Search
Ryan Larkin 1.1 50
Ryan Larkin 5.1 51 AD 01_108 Digital Body Cavity Search
Ryan Larkin 1.1 52
Ryan Larkin 5.1 53 AD 01_109 Initial Search
Ryan Larkin 1.1 54
Ryan Larkin 5.1 55 AD 01_110 Follow-Up Search
Ryan Larkin 1.1 56
Ryan Larkin 5.1 57 AD 01_111 Exigent Circumstances
Ryan Larkin 1.1 58
Ryan Larkin 5.1 59 AD 01_112 Cross Gender
Ryan Larkin 1.1 60
Ryan Larkin 5.1 61 AD 01_113 Mixed Gender
Ryan Larkin 1.1 62
Ryan Larkin 5.1 63 AD 01_114 Unknown Gender
Ryan Larkin 1.1 64
Ryan Larkin 5.1 65
Ryan Larkin 1.1 66
Ryan Larkin 5.1 67 **AD 01_101 __DEFINITIONS__**
Ryan Larkin 1.1 68
69 1. WCSO: Washington County Sheriff's Office
70 1. PCF: Purgatory Correctional Facility
71 1. ICE: Immigration and Customs Enforcement
72 1. Frisk Search (a.k.a., pat search): A search in which an officer rubs or pats the subject's body over his/her clothing to attempt to detect weapons or contraband. Only incidental contact with genital, anal, or female breast areas may result.
73 1. Rub Search: A search, essentially the same as a frisk search, except that a rub search involves a more thorough and intensive search, and does include a careful manual search of the genital, anal, and breast areas over the prisoner's clothing.
74 1. Strip Search: A search which involves the visual inspection of a disrobed subject. Strip searches are considered to be much more intrusive than rub searches and greater justification is required for strip searches. Visual inspection of a subject in undergarments may be considered a strip search.
75 1. Visual Body Cavity Search: A strip search which includes a visual inspection of the anus and/or genital area. Generally, requires the subject to bend over and spread the cheeks of the buttocks, to squat, and/or to otherwise assume a posture which more fully exposes body cavity orifices. Some courts, in addition to finding visual body cavity searches to be more intrusive than strip searches, have found them to be particularly humiliating and dehumanizing.
76 1. Digital Body Cavity Search: A search which involves the probing of the vagina and/or rectum using a gloved finger or other instrument to search for contraband.
77 1. Detainee: A person kept under involuntary restraint who is not currently under arrest.
78 1. Arrestee: A prisoner's status from the time of arrest until the time of correctional facility housing assignment.
79 1. Inmate: A prisoner's status after being moved to a correctional facility housing assignment (including ICE detainees).
80 1. Prisoner: A person deprived of liberty and kept under involuntary restraint, confinement, or custody; especially: one under arrest, awaiting trial, on trial, or serving a prison sentence.
81 1. Exigent: A situation requiring immediate action, assistance, or resolution; something arising suddenly out of current events; pressing need or demand.
82 1. Hermaphrodite: A person born with both male and female sex organs.
83 1. Transsexual: A person who has undergone surgery and hormone injections to effect a change of gender.T
84 1. Transvestite: A person who uses clothing, make-up, and/or other devices to appear to be of the opposite gender.
85 1. Voluntary Waiver (of Sexual Privacy Rights): Actions taken willfully by a prisoner that may reduce the prisoner's sexual privacy rights. Persons may voluntarily waive individual rights. Inmates who voluntarily remove their own clothing or otherwise take actions which result in a loss of sexual privacy waive their right to privacy.
86
Ryan Larkin 5.1 87 **AD 01_102 __REFERENCES__**
Ryan Larkin 1.1 88
89 1. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Standards:
90 11. 13.
91 1. Utah Counties Insurance Pool:
92 11. ML-V.A.2.
93 1. Utah Sheriffs Association Jail Standards:
Ryan Larkin 5.1 94 11. C03.03.01: Scope of Arrestee Searches
95 11. C03.03.02: Reasonable Suspicion Not Required
Ryan Larkin 1.1 96 11. C 03.03.05: Voluntary Waivers
Ryan Larkin 5.1 97 11. C03.03.06: Initial Search of Inmate
98 11. C03.03.07: Follow-Up Search
99 11. F03.01.01: Written Search Policies and Procedures Required
100 11. F03.01.02: Content: Searches
101 11. F03.02.01: Contraband Control
102 11. F03.02.02: Reasonable Searches
103 11. F03.03.01: Basis for Conducting Searches
104 11. F03.03.02: Scope of Intrusion and Justification
105 11. F03.03.03: Manner of Search
106 11. F03.03.04: Rub Searches
107 11. F03.03.05: Strip Searches
108 11. F03.03.07: Digital Body Cavity Searches
109 11. F03.03.08: Exigent Circumstances
110 11. J05.03.03: Admission Searches of Work-Release Inmates
Ryan Larkin 1.1 111 11. N01.03.01: General
Ryan Larkin 5.1 112 11. N01.03.02: Female Inmates
Ryan Larkin 1.1 113 11. N02.01.01: Written Cross-Gender Searches and Supervision Policies and Procedures Required
Ryan Larkin 5.1 114 11. N02.01.02: Content: Cross-Gender Searches and Supervision
115 11. N02.02.01: Frisk and Searches of Male Inmates
116 11. N02.02.02: Strip Searches of Male Inmates
117 11. N02.02.03: Male Searches of Female Inmates
118 11. N02.02.04: Documentation of Searches
Ryan Larkin 1.1 119
Ryan Larkin 5.1 120 **AD 01_103 __GENERAL__**
Ryan Larkin 1.1 121
122 1. Policy:
123 11. Staff shall conduct only reasonable searches.
124 11. The greater the scope of intrusion of a search, the greater must be the justification for conducting the search.
125 11. Searches shall be conducted in a professional manner. Staff members, when conducting searches shall:
126 111. Not make taunting, degrading, dehumanizing, or other inappropriate comments to prisoners;
127 111. Provide an appropriate degree of privacy for intrusive searches or other searches which by their nature would tend to be exceptionally embarrassing or humiliating, if possible;
128 111. Ensure adequate sanitation precautions, when possible; and
129 111. Ensure that persons conducting searches have adequate training and authority to conduct the type of search involved.
Ryan Larkin 4.1 130 11. When force is necessary to enforce a lawful search only a reasonable amount of force shall be used.
Ryan Larkin 1.1 131 11. Searches shall be conducted routinely and randomly, with limitation as explained below.
132 11. A search for safety concerns (i.e., frisk search) should include, at a minimum, a search for:
133 111. Weapons;
134 111. Any object that could be used as a weapon or to inflict harm.
135 11. Any non-frisk search should include, at a minimum, a search for:
136 111. Weapons;
137 111. Drugs;
138 111. Other contraband;
139 111. Indications of medical problems;
140 111. Past suicide attempts;
141 111. Needle "tracks";
142 111. Problems which might require staff intervention or follow-up.
143 11. All searches shall be documented in the Spillman computer system and shall include:
144 111. Date, time, and location of the search;
145 111. The name of the individual searched;
146 111. The name(s) of the officer(s) involved in the search;
147 111. The type (scope of intrusion) of the search that was conducted;
148 111. Information justifying a search more intrusive than a rub search; if applicable.
149 11. All searches shall be conducted in a manner which reduces the risk of contamination or infection. Staff may be at risk of infection. Appropriate precautions should be taken.
150 1. Rationale:
151 11. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 14, of the Constitution of Utah prohibit "unreasonable searches and seizures.”
152 11. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that courts must consider the scope of the particular intrusion and the justification for initiating it. Courts generally have been concerned about the humiliation, embarrassment, and dehumanizing aspects of highly intrusive searches; thus, requiring greater justification for intrusive searches.
153 11. When staff perform searches in a professional manner, they improve the likelihood that challenged searches will be upheld. Conversely, unprofessional searches may result in otherwise proper searches being found to be in violation of prisoners' constitutional rights.
154 11. Searches are a critical element of jail security and should be conducted as part of a set routine. Routine searches should be augmented with random searches to keep prisoners from being able to anticipate when searches will or will not occur. Prisoners have no expectation of privacy while incarcerated, and, thus, are not protected from aggressive search procedures. Searches are particularly vital when prisoners or others are capable of bringing contraband in from the outside, moving contraband from one location to another within the jail, or being prepared for transportation from the facility.
155
Ryan Larkin 5.1 156 **AD 01_104 __FRISK SEARCH__**
Ryan Larkin 1.1 157
158 1. Policy:
159 11. A frisk search of a detainee may be performed at any time, at the officer's discretion.
160 11. A frisk search should only be performed when the officer decides that there is a safety concern that could be addressed by the search.
161 11. A frisk search should not be used to search arrestees or inmates (more thorough searches should be used instead).
162 1. Rationale:
163 11. A frisk search should be used on detainees in lieu of other types of searches in order to preserve the detainee's rights against unlawful searches.
164 11. Because more intrusive searches are permitted and are more successful in detecting weapons and/or contraband, frisk searches should not be used on arrestees or inmates.
165
Ryan Larkin 5.1 166 **AD 01_105 __RUB SEARCH__**
Ryan Larkin 1.1 167
168 1. Policy:
169 11. All prisoners shall be subject to rub searches at any time during their incarceration at PCF. Rub searches may be conducted on a routine, selective, or random basis.
170 11. Unless a more intrusive search is justified, all prisoners (including detainees) shall be rub searched by PCF officers at admission to PCF.
171 11. Routine rub searches may include, but are not limited to:
172 111. Arrestees, by arresting officers at the time of arrest;
173 111. Arrestees, by PCF staff at admission to PCF;
174 111. Inmates returning to PCF from outside the secure areas of the jail;
175 111. Inmates in an area of a scheduled shakedown or area search;
176 111. Inmates leaving the secure area of the jail who are still in custody;
177 111. Inmates moving between security zones in the jail (e.g., from one housing unit to another or from the kitchen to a housing unit).
178 11. Rationale:
179 111. The courts have recognized the importance of searching prisoners to maintain facility security. They consider rub searches as relatively unintrusive and permit their use on a virtually unlimited basis. Because rub searches involve a low degree of intrusion, no justification is required other than the incarceration of the prisoner. Privacy is not ordinarily a requirement for rub searches.
180
Ryan Larkin 5.1 181 **AD 01_106 __STRIP SEARCH__**
Ryan Larkin 1.1 182
183 1. Policy:
184 11. Strip searches shall be done in a manner which reasonably ensures that prisoners being searched are observed only by:
185 111. Staff conducting or assisting with the search; and/or
186 111. Staff working in the area.
187 11. Strip searches may include:
188 111. Arrestees at admission as detailed in the Initial Search section below (AD 01_110);
189 111. Inmates returning to PCF from outside the secure areas of the jail;
190 111. Inmates believed to be in possession of contraband;
191 111. Inmates in an area of a scheduled shakedown or area search;
192 111. Inmates leaving the secure area of the jail who are still in custody;
193 111. Inmates moving between security zones in the jail (e.g., moving from one housing unit to another, moving from the kitchen to a housing unit, going to or returning from a non-barrier visit, etc.).
194 111. Inmates being placed on punitive lockdown status;
195 111. Inmates being placed on administrative segregation status;
196 111. Inmates being placed on suicide watch status;
197 11. Strip searches require reasonable suspicion for prisoners of “arrestee” status.
198 11. Strip searches do not require reasonable suspicion for prisoners of “inmate” status.
199 1. Rationale:
200 11. Strip searches have been recognized by the courts for their importance in maintaining facility security; however, they have found strip searches to be highly intrusive. Because they are intrusive, the courts have consistently held that arrestees cannot be subjected to strip searches unless there is individualized or reasonable suspicion that a prisoner has contraband. Reasonable suspicion may be assumed for prisoners whose charges, criminal histories, or current probation or parole status would reasonably be assumed to create a significant risk. The court's rationale in limiting strip searches for arrestees is that persons who are not part of the criminal subculture and who are briefly in jail awaiting bond or recognizance release for minor offenses should not be required to endure the humiliation of the strip search, because they will likely be released within minutes or a very few hours and are not, therefore, a great risk to the security of the facility. The restriction on strip searches is relaxed after arrestees have exhausted their options to gain pretrial release and have become a part of the jail population.
201 11. Strip searches are a necessary tool in protecting jail security and safety because:
202 111. Prisoners are capable of hiding weapons, drugs, and other contraband on their bodies in ways that substantially reduce the likelihood that the hidden items will be found in a frisk or rub search; and
203 111. Strip searches add a dimension to the search which permits visual examination of the subject in a manner which, if done competently, ensures that contraband hidden on the body will be found, and in some instances, may lead to discovery of contraband hidden in body cavities.
204 11. Persons may voluntarily waive individual rights. Inmates who voluntarily remove their own clothing or otherwise take actions which result in a loss of sexual privacy waive their right to privacy. Visual observation of unclothed prisoners may be unavoidable when there is a voluntary waiver of sexual privacy rights.
205
Ryan Larkin 5.1 206 **AD 01_107 __VISUAL BODY CAVITY SEARCH__**
Ryan Larkin 1.1 207
208 1. Policy:
209 11. Visual body cavity searches shall be done in a manner which reasonably ensures that prisoners being searched are observed only by:
210 111. Staff conducting or assisting with the search; and/or
211 111. Staff working in the area.
212 11. Visual body cavity searches may include:
213 111. Arrestees at admission as detailed in the Initial Search section below (AD 01_110);
214 111. Inmates believed to be in possession of contraband;
215 111. Inmates in an area of a scheduled shakedown or area search;
216 111. Inmates leaving the secure area of the jail who are still in custody;
217 111. Inmates moving between security zones in the jail (e.g., moving from one housing unit to another, moving from the kitchen to a housing unit, going to or returning from a non-barrier visit, etc.).
218 11. Visual body cavity searches shall be conducted for inmates:
219 111. Returning to PCF from outside the secure areas of the jail;
220 111. Being placed on punitive lockdown status;
221 111. Being placed on administrative segregation status;
222 111. Being placed on suicide watch status;
223 11. Visual body cavity searches require reasonable suspicion for prisoners of “arrestee” status.
224 11. Visual body cavity searches do not require reasonable suspicion for prisoners of “inmate” status.
225 1. Rationale:
226 11. It is important to keep judicial concerns about the intrusiveness of visual body cavity searches in mind; however, the legal tests for strip searches and visual body cavity searches are essentially identical in most jurisdictions.
227
Ryan Larkin 5.1 228 **AD 01_108 __DIGITAL BODY CAVITY SEARCH__**
Ryan Larkin 1.1 229
230 1. Policy:
231 11. Digital body cavity searches shall be conducted in a private room and shall be done in a manner which reasonably ensures that prisoners being searched are observed only by staff conducting or assisting with the search.
232 11. Digital body cavity searches may be used when jail officers have a reasonable suspicion that a prisoner has drugs or other contraband hidden in the rectum or vagina.
233 11. Digital body-cavity searches shall be:
234 111. Conducted by medical personnel;
235 111. Done in a manner which reasonably ensures that prisoners being searched are observed only by staff conducting or assisting with the search.
236 11. Approval from the Corrections Chief Deputy should be obtained prior to a digital body cavity search being performed.
237 11. A valid search warrant should be obtained prior to performing a digital body cavity search.
238 1. Rationale:
239 11. The courts have recognized the importance of searching prisoners to maintain facility security; however, they have found digital body cavity searches to be the most intrusive and demeaning type of search. Because of the degree of intrusiveness involved, the courts will evaluate digital body cavity searches very carefully. Digital searches remain a viable search option, because:
240 111. The use of body cavities by prisoners to hide or transport contraband is not uncommon among persons who are handled by corrections officials;
241 111. While visual body cavity searches may on occasion detect indications that contraband is hidden in a body-cavity (e.g., the end of a balloon or condom protruding from the anus), in most instances the detection of contraband in a body cavity will only be possible with a digital search;
242 111. When prisoners become aware that digital searches are infrequently used, they quickly learn to hide contraband in the rectum and/or vagina;
243 111. Digital searches often result in discoveries of hidden contraband; and
244 111. Use of digital searches increases the risk of being detected for prisoners who violate contraband regulations and may deter some of the prohibited activity.
245 11. Although not a legal requirement, obtaining a valid search warrant prior to conducting a digital body cavity search may assist with the defense of a potential related lawsuit.
246
Ryan Larkin 5.1 247 **AD 01_109 __INITIAL SEARCH__**
Ryan Larkin 1.1 248
249 1. Policy:
250 11. All arrestees entering the jail shall receive an initial search by PCF staff. The initial search shall be a rub search, unless a more intrusive search is required because there is:
251 111. Reasonable suspicion that the arrestee is in possession of criminal evidence, a weapon, or other item of contraband which would present an immediate threat to the safety or security of the facility; or
252 111. Reason to believe that the arrestee may have medical, mental health, or suicide-related problems which indicate the need for the more intrusive search.
253 11. Arrestees brought to the jail should not be strip or visual body cavity searched absent an individualized determination of reasonable suspicion to believe that the arrestee is in possession of:
254 111. A weapon;
255 111. A controlled substance;
256 111. Criminal evidence; or
257 111. Other contraband which:
258 1111. Would present a threat to the safety of staff or other persons in the jail;
259 1111. Would present a threat to the security of the facility;
260 1111. Has a health condition requiring immediate medical intervention, and a more intrusive search is required to confirm the information.
261 11. Individualized suspicion shall not be required to justify a strip search or visual body cavity search if the arrestee is received:
262 111. Under sentence from a court;
263 111. As an in-transit hold;
264 111. As a transfer from another corrections facility or corrections agency; or
265 111. For violation of probation or parole.
266 1. Rationale:
267 11. The purpose of the initial search is to subject all arrestees who enter the jail to a quick check for weapons, drugs, and other contraband to provide a reasonable margin of safety during the booking process by disarming arrestees and detecting more easily discoverable items of contraband which could present an immediate threat to the safety and security of the jail. Jails have strong security and safety interests in searching arrestees entering the facility. A lawful arrest establishes the authority to search. Strip searches may also be justified where there is reason to believe that an arrestee has mental health problems or is concealing evidence of medical problems or past suicide attempts. The need to protect the arrestee from himself and to protect others from infectious illness justifies a more intrusive search. A blanket strip search policy for all arrestees received for admission may not survive constitutional challenge. Rub searches should ordinarily be sufficient to meet the requirements of the initial search. More intrusive admission searches are justified if there is reasonable suspicion that the arrestee possesses contraband which might jeopardize the safety or security of the jail. A more complete search can be done at the conclusion of the booking process if the inmate is not released after booking.
268 11. The reasonable suspicion standard for intrusive searches is a clearly established constitutional requirement.
269 11. Court decisions requiring reasonable suspicion before conducting intrusive searches during the admissions process apply only to pretrial arrestees being booked for nonviolent misdemeanors.
270
Ryan Larkin 5.1 271 **AD 01_110 __FOLLOW-UP SEARCH__**
Ryan Larkin 1.1 272
273 1. Policy:
274 11. If a prisoner has exhausted efforts to make bail or obtain other pre-arraignment release and must be moved into the jail population, a more thorough search may then be provided. A strip search or visual body cavity search may be conducted at this stage. However, prisoners shall not be transitioned from arrestee status for the purpose of conducting a strip search or visual body cavity search.
275 11. Justification for a follow-up search more intrusive than a rub search must follow the guidelines of that type of search as specified in other sections of this policy.
276 11. Prisoners shall maintain arrestee status if it is likely that the prisoner may attain bail or release within four hours. Four hours is an administrative guideline, not a legal requirement:
277 111. A longer period of time may be granted if there is a high probability that an imminent release may be attained and there is space in the admissions holding cells.
278 111. A shorter period of time may be justified if the likelihood of an imminent release is remote and the admissions holding cells are crowded.
279 1. Rationale:
280 11. Arrestees should not be moved from the admissions area until reasonable efforts to secure a bail release have been exhausted. When the prisoner is moved to the general population, more thorough and intrusive searches are justified because moving a prisoner into the general population who has not been thoroughly searched increases the potential for introduction of weapons, drugs, or other dangerous contraband into the general population; jeopardizing the safety of staff, the safety of other inmates, and the security of the facility.
281
Ryan Larkin 5.1 282 **AD 01_111 __EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES__**
Ryan Larkin 1.1 283
284 1. Policy:
285 11. Exigent circumstances may justify a search which under normal conditions would not ordinarily justify the search or level of intrusiveness of the search.
286 1. Rationale:
287 11. Emergencies and other circumstances which require immediate action to meet safety or security needs create an exception to the limits on searches.
288
Ryan Larkin 5.1 289 **AD 01_112 __CROSS GENDER__**
Ryan Larkin 1.1 290
291 1. Policy:
292 11. Female staff may rub search male prisoners in the normal course of duty;
293 11. Female staff may strip search or visual body cavity search male prisoners when:
294 111. Unintentional and the prisoner's actions amount to a voluntary waiver of sexual privacy interests; or
295 111. Demanded by exigent circumstances; and
296 111. A male deputy or trained male staff member is not available to complete the search; and
297 111. Waiting for the availability of a male deputy or trained male staff member would place the safety of persons or the security of the facility at significant risk (In most cases where a male staff member is not available to search a male prisoner, the prisoner should be isolated in a cell until a male staff member is available to complete the search.).
298 11. Male staff shall not search female prisoners unless:
299 111. Unintentional and the prisoner's actions amount to a voluntary waiver of sexual privacy interests; or
300 111. The female prisoner refuses to submit to a lawful search and/or is aggressive, fighting, physically resisting the search, and acting in a manner that creates reasonable cause to believe that the search cannot be completed without assistance from male officers; or
301 111. Demanded by exigent circumstances; and
302 111. A female deputy or trained female staff member is not available to complete the search; and
303 111. Waiting for the availability of a female deputy or trained female staff member would place the safety of persons or the security of the facility at significant risk (In most cases where a female staff member is not available to search a female prisoner, the prisoner should be isolated in a cell until a female staff member is available to complete the search.).
304 111. Refer to “Inmate Surveillance and Supervision” policy (CC 08).
305 1. Rationale:
306 11. Because Title VII prohibits gender-based employment discrimination and more than 90 percent of all prisoners are male, women must be permitted to conduct as many of the duties of corrections officers as possible. As a general rule, cross-gender searches by female officers have been upheld by the courts. The courts have differed on the scope or level of intrusion. Some have permitted female officers the same latitude as granted to male officers searching male prisoners. Other courts have been more cautious. Limiting female participation in searches:
307 111. Places a disproportionate work load and burden on male staff members;
308 111. Restricts female officers from the opportunity of gaining the work experience which is necessary to compete for promotion and assignments;
309 111. May reduce safety or security by limiting the number of expeditious and random searches of prisoners conducted by jail staff.
310 111. The requirements of Title VII which justify cross-gender searches by female staff, do not justify males searching female prisoners. Only under very limited exigent circumstances or where a female prisoner intentionally removes her own clothing or otherwise acts in a manner which amounts to a voluntary waiver of sexual privacy interests are male officers justified in participating in searches of female prisoners.
311 11. Refer to “Inmate Surveillance and Supervision” policy (CC 08).
312
Ryan Larkin 5.1 313 **AD 01_113 __MIXED GENDER__**
Ryan Larkin 1.1 314
315 1. Policy:
316 11. Hermaphrodites shall be searched by the gender that is most predominate in the prisoner to be searched, as determined by the on-duty supervisor.
317 11. Transsexuals shall be searched by the gender that is the prisoner's current gender.
318 11. Transvestites shall be searched by the gender that is the prisoner's current gender, whether or not the prisoner appears to be the opposite gender.
319 1. Rationale
320 11. Mixed gender situations can be confusing to staff who need to complete prisoner searches. Some situations may need to be deferred to the best judgment of the individuals conducting the searches.
321
Ryan Larkin 5.1 322 **AD 01_114 __UNKNOWN GENDER__**
Ryan Larkin 1.1 323
324 1. Policy:
325 11. In the event that the gender of a prisoner is in question, the prisoner shall be strip searched by the prisoner-claimed gender for verification. If the prisoner refuses to comply and does not claim a specific gender, the prisoner shall be strip searched by the gender that most predominately appears to be the gender of the prisoner, as determined by the on-duty supervisor.
326 1. Rationale:
327 11. Erroneously housing a prisoner with a population of the opposite gender could result in a multitude of problems and/or liability issues.