Wiki source code of AB 11 Internal Affairs and Criminal Investigations
Version 2.1 by Ryan Larkin on 2019/05/13 17:16
Hide last authors
author | version | line-number | content |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.1 | 1 | **Washington County Sheriff's Office** |
2 | |||
3 | **ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION** | ||
4 | |||
5 | Policy Manual | ||
6 | |||
7 | |||
8 | Volume: AB | ||
9 | |||
10 | Services and Programs | ||
11 | |||
12 | Chapter: 11 | ||
13 | |||
14 | Internal Affairs and Criminal Investigations | ||
15 | |||
16 | |||
17 | Replaces and/or Supersedes: | ||
18 | |||
19 | None. | ||
20 | |||
21 | Published: | ||
22 | |||
23 | 04/11/2012 | ||
24 | |||
25 | Review Date: | ||
26 | |||
![]() |
2.1 | 27 | 05/13/2019 |
![]() |
1.1 | 28 | |
29 | |||
30 | Sheriff Cory C. Pulsipher | ||
31 | |||
![]() |
2.1 | 32 | Undersheriff James Standley |
![]() |
1.1 | 33 | |
34 | |||
35 | __**TABLE OF CONTENTS**__ | ||
36 | |||
37 | AB 11_101 Definitions | ||
38 | |||
39 | AB 11_102 General | ||
40 | |||
41 | |||
![]() |
1.2 | 42 | **AB 11_101 __DEFINITIONS__** |
![]() |
1.1 | 43 | |
44 | 1. WCSO: Washington County Sheriff's Office | ||
45 | 1. PCF: Purgatory Correctional Facility | ||
46 | |||
![]() |
1.2 | 47 | **AB 11_102 __GENERAL__** |
![]() |
1.1 | 48 | |
49 | 1. Policy: | ||
![]() |
2.1 | 50 | 11. Internal investigations on WCSO employees should be conducted only with authorization from the Sheriff and, when necessary, with direction of the County Attorney's Office. |
![]() |
1.1 | 51 | 11. Criminal investigations on WCSO employees should be deferred to an external (non-WCSO) agency. |
52 | 11. A separate internal investigation by the WCSO may be conducted while an external investigation is still ongoing. Internal investigators shall not interfere with the external investigation and shall not share Garrity-protected information with external investigators. | ||
53 | 1. Rationale: | ||
54 | 11. An investigation of an employee's suspected criminal actions will provide information necessary for the WCSO to prepare for potential litigation. | ||
55 | 11. An external investigation of an employee's suspected criminal actions may be considered more credible. | ||
56 | 11. The interference or sharing of information by internal investigators could compromise the integrity of an external investigation. |