Wiki source code of CG 05 Inmate Classification

Version 3.1 by Ryan Larkin on 2021/12/16 18:15

Show last authors
1 **Washington County Sheriff's Office**
2
3 **CORRECTIONS DIVISION**
4
5 Policy Manual
6
7
8 Volume: CG
9
10 Inmate Management
11
12 Chapter: 05
13
14 Inmate Classification
15
16
17 Replaces and/or Supersedes:
18
19 PG 10, PG 11, PG 12a, PG 12b, PG 12c, PG 12d, PG 15, PG 20, PG 22,
20
21 PG 23, CG 05 Review 2011-09-01
22
23 Published:
24
25 09/01/2011
26
27 Date Reviewed:
28
29 12/16/2021
30
31
32 Sheriff Nate Brooksby
33
34 Chief Deputy Trevor Benson
35
36
37 **__TABLE OF CONTENTS__**
38
39 CG 05_101 Definitions
40
41 CG 05_102  General
42
43 CG 05_103  Supervision & Training
44
45 CG 05_104  Non-Punitive
46
47 CG 05_105  Pre-Classification
48
49 CG 05_106  Classification
50
51 CG 05_107  Classification Code
52
53 CG 05_108  Classification Review
54
55 CG 05_109  Housing
56
57 CG 05_110  Classification Challenges
58
59 CG 05_111  Inmate Uniforms
60
61 CG 05_112  Utah State Prisoners
62
63 CG 05_113  Documentation
64
65
66 **CG 05_101 __DEFINITIONS__**
67
68 1. WCSO: Washington County Sheriff's Office
69 1. PCF: Purgatory Correctional Facility
70 1. Corrections Officer: A Corrections certified officer by Utah Peace Officer Standards and Training.
71 1. ICE: Immigration and Customs Enforcement
72 1. Administrative Segregation: Non-punitive segregation determined by administrative review.
73 1. Step-Down: A type of Administrative Segregation. A temporary down-grade of an inmate's classification level, in conjunction with close administrative review.
74
75
76
77 **CG 05_102  __GENERAL__**
78
79 1. Policy:
80 11. PCF shall maintain written policy and procedures which provide the requirements for and elements of an inmate classification plan to:
81 111. Be used in determining housing assignments, access to programs and activities, and general management of inmates; and
82 111. Provide for the separation of inmates by sex and by such other factors as may reasonably provide for the safety and well-being of inmates and the community.
83 11. The classification plan shall take into consideration the design of the jail and shall identify the classification levels which can be housed in various cells and cell blocks. Classification procedures should be developed to offset the facility's design disadvantages or flaws.
84 11. At a minimum, the classification system shall provide a means of:
85 111. Evaluating inmates':
86 1111. Propensity for violence;
87 1111. Vulnerability to violence;
88 1111. Escape risk;
89 1111. Propensity for being disruptive or a management problem;
90 1111. Need for specific programs and services;
91 1111. Possible gang affiliation;
92 1111. Potential for infecting other inmates with a communicable disease; and
93 1111. Other needs to be segregated from others;
94 111. Determining:
95 1111. Appropriate levels of custody and housing assignments; and
96 1111. Eligibility for programs and services.
97 11. Components which shall be included in the classification plan include:
98 111. Pre-classification;
99 111. Classification;
100 111. Re-assessment (a.k.a., Classification Review);
101 111. Security threat groups;
102 111. Other inmates requiring special management;
103 111. Non-punitive isolation; and
104 111. Transfers of Utah State prisoners.
105 11. Applicable content and procedures regarding classification shall be communicated to inmates in a language or manner which the inmates can understand. Classification shall utilize translation services when necessary. The Inmate Orientation Packet shall include an explanation of the classification levels, with the conditions and restrictions applicable to each and the procedures by which a detainee may appeal his/her classification.
106 1. Rationale:
107 11. Written policies and procedures are necessary to ensure that staff members understand the purpose, function, and elements of the inmate classification system.
108 11. Adoption and implementation of written policy for the classification of persons incarcerated in jail is also required by statute.
109 11. Classification is an important tool in managing inmates, providing a safe facility, and preventing inmates from escaping. Without some form of classification process, jail administrators face a very difficult challenge in meeting these important functions.
110
111 **CG 05_103  __SUPERVISION & TRAINING__**
112
113 1. Policy:
114 11. PCF shall designate an officer to supervise the classification system.
115 11. The classification supervisor should:
116 111. Be responsible for reviewing classification, re-classification, and special housing assignments;
117 111. Have the authority to overrule classification actions; and
118 111. Handle inmate classification challenges and grievances.
119 11. The classification supervisor may utilize the assistance of other staff members, as approved by the Corrections Chief Deputy.
120 11. The classification supervisor may have other duties and responsibilities.
121 11. Classification training should be provided for those officers who are involved in the classification process. Advanced classification training should be provided to the classification supervisor.
122 11. All classification officers shall be certified Corrections Officers.
123 11. All classification officers shall receive annual training and shall receive specific instruction on the PCF classification system.
124 1. Rationale:
125 11. Designating an officer to administer the classification system is necessary to ensure that the classification process operates in a consistent and uniform manner and makes it more difficult for inmates to manipulate the system.
126 11. Classification is the backbone of inmate management and a necessary component in maintaining safety and security in the facility. To understand the function and important elements of the classification system, training is needed concerning procedural requirements. The responsibility of supervising the classification process requires more advanced training including procedural, legal, documentation, and operational topics.
127
128 **CG 05_104  __NON-PUNITIVE__**
129
130 1. Policy:
131 11. The inmate classification system shall be operated as a non-punitive management system, separate and distinct from inmate discipline. However, disciplinary violations may be included among the criteria used in classifying and reclassifying inmates.
132 1. Rationale:
133 11. If the classification process is operated as a non-punitive system, separate and distinct from the punitive inmate discipline system, classification decisions do not trigger due process requirements for inmates.
134
135 **CG 05_105  __PRE-CLASSIFICATION__**
136
137 1. Policy:
138 11. Pre-classification procedures shall be managed according to policy: [[CF 02 Admission and Booking>>doc:Policy.Corrections.CF 02 Admission Booking and Bail.WebHome]].
139
140 **CG 05_106  __CLASSIFICATION__**
141
142 1. Policy:
143 11. Unclassified inmates should be classified expeditiously upon admission (within seven days) and prior to general housing (i.e., housed in an intake cell or block).
144 11. Any inmate who cannot be classified because of missing information at the time of processing (e.g., the results of a criminal record check) may be kept separated from the general population. Once the needed information is obtained, classification shall be expedited.
145 11. PCF shall adopt specific criteria to be used in classifying inmates. That criteria should include, but not be limited to:
146 111. Gender;
147 111. Age;
148 111. Offense;
149 111. Criminal history;
150 111. Time until release;
151 111. Observed, seriously irregular behavior; and
152 111. If known or obvious to jail officials:
153 1111. Communicable disease;
154 1111. Seriously mentally or emotionally disordered;
155 1111. Escape history;
156 1111. Violence history;
157 1111. Drug abuse history;
158 1111. Association with security threat group;
159 1111. Disciplinary history; and
160 1111. Disruptive behavior history.
161 11. Race shall not be used as a criteria to segregate inmates.
162 11. Inmates shall be segregated by gender. Male and female inmates shall be housed in a manner which:
163 111. Does not permit inmates to routinely view the living areas (cells and day rooms) of inmates of the opposite gender; and
164 111. Prevents routine verbal conversation between male and female inmates.
165 11. Inmates known by jail officials to be a serious risk to commit violent acts against others should be segregated, or other reasonable measures should be taken to mitigate the risk.
166 11. Inmates who present a serious risk of infecting other inmates with a communicable disease should be segregated, if deemed necessary by medical authority.
167 1. Rationale:
168 11. The classification factors listed above may, individually or in combination, have some value as predictors of an inmate's behavior while incarcerated.
169 11. Some factors have greater value than others.
170 11. Using race as a criteria to segregate inmates has been found to violate the United States Constitution. However, corrections officials do have the right, acting in good faith and in particularized circumstances, to take into account racial tensions in maintaining security, discipline, and good order.
171 11. Separation of male and female inmates is required by state law. It is not intended that male and female inmates shall be absolutely separated by sight and sound. Separation is required only to the extent necessary to protect inmates and to further the legitimate safety, security, order, and discipline interests of the jail.
172 11. Inmates are entitled to precautions which provide reasonable protection from other inmates who present a known, serious, and immediate risk to their lives or safety. Jail officials cannot absolutely guarantee the safety of jailed inmates, but must take reasonable steps to protect inmates' safety. Jail officials must not be deliberately indifferent to the safety of inmates.
173 11. Jail officials have a difficult and sometimes impossible task because they cannot act upon information which they do not have, nor can they assume that every inmate who has ever committed a violent act is a serious or immediate risk to others (the majority of inmates have some violence in their criminal history or other past).
174 11. Jails are closed environments where inmates and staff coexist in close proximity. Preventing the spread of communicable diseases may require segregation of inmates when the type of disease is sufficiently serious and contagious.
175
176 **CG 05_107  __CLASSIFICATION CODE__**
177
178 1. Policy:
179 11. Inmates will be classified with an alphanumeric classification code (e.g. 1A, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5A).
180 11. Classification levels include levels one through five, with one being the highest security risk.
181 1. Rationale:
182 11. A classification system allows jail staff to address multiple issues with one classification code per inmate (e.g., housing assignments, programming privileges, permitted property, etc.).
183
184 **CG 05_108  __CLASSIFICATION REVIEW__**
185
186 1. Policy:
187 11. Classification reviews should be conducted, at a minimum, according to the following schedule:
188 111. Administrative Segregation (including Step-Down, security threat groups, non-punitive isolation, and other special management inmates): at least once per week;
189 111. When new criminal charges are filed;
190 111. Lock Down:
191 1111. After lock down time is completed for violent offenses, the inmate should remain on step down status with a Level-1 classification for an additional 30 days and noted on the Special Housing List (i.e., "SDLV-1”). After 30 days as SDLV-1, the inmate's status should be changed to SDLV-2 for another 30 days. After 30 days as SDLV-2, the inmate should receive a classification review and be housed accordingly;
192 111. Level-1, and Level-2: at least once every 180 days;
193 111. Level-3 and higher: at least once every year.
194 11. An inmate should not receive a classification review after non-criminal disciplinary action.
195 11. Additional reviews may be conducted as needed.
196 1. Rationale:
197 11. Predicting inmate behavior is a difficult and imprecise science. Often, officers must base classification decisions on limited information. Regular classification reviews will help ensure accurate classification determinations.
198 11. In prisons, officials can take days or weeks to classify a prisoner, and have pre-sentence investigations and other information to rely on. The nature of inmate classification in jails requires decisions to be made swiftly, frequently with limited available information. Thus, while prisons can function comfortably with annual classification re-assessments, jails should review more frequently.
199
200 **CG 05_109  __HOUSING__**
201
202 1. Policy:
203 11. Level 1 and 1A inmates may not be housed with any other level of inmate unless approved by the Special Housing Committee or the Chief Deputy.
204 11. Excluding Level 1 and 1A inmates, inmates may be housed with inmates one level above or one level below their assigned level.
205 11. Inmates housed in a cell shall be allowed time out of their cell according to the current Time Out Of Cell schedule. Inmates housed in a cell shall be informed of their scheduled out of cell times. A log entry should be created in the jail computer system under the individual inmate's name to record each time out of cell event.
206 1. Rationale:
207 11. A classification system serves little purpose if it is not used as a housing tool in order to help protect inmates and provide order.
208
209 **CG 05_110  __CLASSIFICATION CHALLENGES__**
210
211 1. Policy:
212 11. Inmates may be allowed to request reconsideration of their classification assignment by submitting a Classification Challenge via a request form.
213 11. Inmates may be permitted one classification challenge per classification determination.
214 11. A classification challenge will not guarantee a change in the classification assignment; however, it will guarantee that a classification review will be conducted.
215 1. Rationale:
216 11. Due process is not constitutionally mandated for classification or re-classification determinations, unless a right is created by state action. Utah statute does not create a liberty interest which would require due process or a right of appeal for inmates. However, providing an opportunity for inmates to request reconsideration of their classification can be of benefit to both the inmate and jail officials. Inmates benefit by receiving an opportunity to request a review of a classification determination. If there is a flaw in the classification, jail officials benefit because the flaw can be discovered and corrected before it creates problems for the jail.
217
218 **CG 05_111  __INMATE UNIFORMS__**
219
220 1. Policy:
221 11. Each inmate shall be issued color-coded uniforms according to their classification level or housing unit as follows:
222 111. Level-1A: solid red;
223 111. Level-1 and/or Lockdown: red stripes;
224 111. Level-2: black stripes;
225 111. Level-3, Level-4, Level-5 (interior) and Level-5A (interior): blue stripes;
226 111. Level-5 (exterior) and Level-5A (exterior): green stripes;
227 111. Unclassified: orange stripes;
228 111. Interior worker (while at work): solid white;
229 111. Exterior worker (while at work): solid “lime” green.
230 1. Rationale:
231 11. Staff may easily identify an inmate's classification according to the inmate's current uniform. An inmate's classification informs staff of the potential threat level of the specific inmate. By assisting staff with the identification of potential threats, staff may be better prepared to manage the inmate or possible situations involving the inmate.
232
233 **CG 05_112  __UTAH STATE PRISONERS__**
234
235 1. Policy:
236 11. Unless a PCF administrative override is conducted, Utah State prisoners shall retain their classification level assigned from the prison.
237 11. PCF should only accept custody of Utah State prisoners who have been classified as a Level-3 or higher.
238 11. If a Utah State prisoner's classification falls below Level-3 while housed at PCF, the prisoner shall be promptly transferred from PCF.
239 1. Rationale:
240 11. Utah State prisoners who are classified below a Level-3 are deemed too dangerous or too high of a risk to be housed at PCF.
241
242 **CG 05_113  __DOCUMENTATION__**
243
244 1. Policy:
245 11. Classification determinations shall be documented in the jail computer system.
246 11. Classification files and/or forms used to reach a classification determination shall be retained and archived for a minimum of three years.
247 1. Rationale:
248 11. Proper documentation memorializes actions taken and decisions made.
249 11. Inmate classification actions and decisions should be documented to preserve a record:
250 111. As an aid to defending possible future litigation;
251 111. To provide information which jail officials can use in order to stay informed;
252 111. For use in future classification actions involving the inmate; and
253 111. To provide data which can be quantified for use by jail officials.